You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items

  • Author or Editor: Daniela De Leo x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Daniela De Leo

The focus of this book suggested the need to develop a different reading of the results achieved from a previous research work about a special subset of politicians not only with an academic background in urban planning but also as professors in this field, which I called prof(ass)essori. So, the chapter, from one side, underlines how this academic background impacts political action, but also how political experience impacts academic work, by reflecting on political actions taken by urban planning professors; from the other side, explanations regarding the falseness of certain theoretical dichotomies such as technique and politics, and the emergent, but unexpected relevance of “asymmetries of power” are underlined. Asymmetries of power are discussed as challenges for political action well managed by the prof(ass)essori, and to suggest strategies for educating future urban planners. Then they are finally stretched to suggest a simple essential knowledge set for politicians, albeit they lack the urban planning background to make a much greater difference in their duties on city and territorial issues.