You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Geraint Harvey x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Geraint Harvey

Drawing on an in-depth ethnographic study of non-standard work, the chapter considers the ways in which observation was key to understanding the work of fitness industry personal trainers as unique, i.e. as neo-villeiny. Following a brief introduction to participation observation, this chapter focuses on the method in practice. The aesthetic dimension of the personal trainer’s work is critical and without participant observation the ‘instrumental peacocking’ (Harvey et al., 2014: 462), whereby the personal trainer showcases their physical capital (Bourdieu, 1984) in order to attract clients, might have been missed. The chapter also illustrates the ways in which participant observation was necessary in order to understand the quality or genuineness of emotional labour. Most importantly, perhaps, the chapter documents the importance of participation observation in documenting the extensiveness of ‘work-for-labour’ (Standing, 2011), which was core to the concept of neo-villeiny.

You do not have access to this content

Geraint Harvey and Peter Turnbull

On both sides of the Atlantic, the emergence of low fares airlines (LFAs) was contingent on the liberalization of air transport services. Prior to the late-1970s in the USA and the mid-1990s in Europe the civil aviation sector was governed by strict rules on market access in the domestic market and bilateral air service agreements (BASAs) between countries that regulated international routes. BASAs typically specified the destinations (city pairs), carriers (typically the national ‘flag’ airline of the respective countries), flight frequency, capacity, and prices. Some BASAs even included revenue sharing. As a result, an airline only had to be as efficient as the other airline on an international route and there was little or no incentive to drive down costs or drive up productivity. After all, prices were predetermined, capacity was agreed (reducing any scope for economies of scale), and any additional revenue generated might ultimately be shared with the rival airline/state.