You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Ingrida Veiksa x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Ingrida Veiksa and Ivita Kisnica

The present paper analyses the issues related to the legitimate use of copyright protected content available on the Internet and deals with the limitation of rights and remuneration to creators of that digital content. Due to technological progress, works made available on the Internet are easily accessible, their content tends to be increasingly affluent and enticing, and everyone seeks to view, listen and share it with friends and relatives, using the advantages provided by the new technologies. The presently applicable regulation, however, does not meet the wishes and interests of society, and society tends to ignore any rules it does not understand. Circulation of works on the Internet is conducted continuously without the authors’ permission and also without users paying for it. Therefore, a mechanism should be established to enable the quick and simple access by society to cultural products and ensure the fair compensation of the creators of such products. The main research question raised by this study is whether the public is ready for a new payment, which would allow consumers legal access to the digital content available on the Internet. The survey seeking to answer this question was conducted among students. The study demonstrates that mostly society is ready for a new small payment if it allows them to use digital content on the Internet legally.

You do not have access to this content

Janis Bordans and Ingrida Veiksa

In Latvia, copyright is guaranteed by the Constitution and protected by the Copyright Law which was adopted by the Latvian Parliament on 6 April 2000, with entry into force on 11 May 2000. The Law has been amended on several occasions, with the amendments of 2004 implementing Directive 2001/29/EC. It should be noted that some implemented rules are stronger than the European Directive requires, even though the Directive allows fewer strict regulations in some cases. For example, regarding exceptions to copyright, no provisions are included in Latvian Copyright Law regarding incidental inclusion (Art. 5(3)(i)), advertising in public exhibitions (Art. 5(3)(j)), demonstration and repair (Art. 5(3)(l)), reconstruction of buildings (Art. 5(3)(m)) and uses in cases of minor importance (Art. 5(3)(o)). All in all, it can however be concluded that Directive 2001/29/EC has been implemented successfully into Latvian law.