You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items

  • Author or Editor: James P Nehf x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

James P. Nehf

You do not have access to this content

James P. Nehf

This chapter discusses the regulation of misleading and unfair advertising in consumer-targeted media. It examines approaches to the regulation of advertising in general and provides an overview of basic standards for determining both misleading and unfair advertising. It also addresses the regulation of advertising in several specific subject areas that lawmakers have targeted for special treatment in many countries. Towards the end of the chapter the discussion moves to enforcement regimes: self-regulatory enforcement of advertising guidelines, civil enforcement through private actions for breach of advertising norms, and enforcement actions brought by government agencies to police the marketplace for the good of the general public. The chapter incorporates illustrations from the laws of different countries, with an emphasis on US and EU law, but with some discussion of interesting approaches from other countries as well.

You do not have access to this content

James P Nehf

The 2014 White House paper on privacy and big data signaled that the Obama administration might acknowledge that efforts to limit data collection online through a “notice and choice” regime have failed and instead work toward developing data privacy norms that focus more on permissible purposes of data collection in an attempt to limit its use post-collection. When it came to proposing legislation, however, the administration retreated from its earlier rhetoric, and in 2015 proposed a privacy Bill of Rights that wholly embraced notice and choice, albeit in an enhanced or heightened state for certain kinds of data collection that were perceived to be particularly sensitive. The first section of this chapter discusses the proposed privacy legislation and its inclusion of a heightened notice and choice framework. The second part explains why even heightened notice and choice fails to protect legitimate privacy interests, particularly in an online environment. The third section explores what a regime based on permissible uses of data might look like and includes suggestions on how we might get there.