You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Louise Arimatsu x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Louise Arimatsu

This chapter considers how the classification of armed conflict applies to cyber warfare. Classifying the particular conflict – in other words determining whether it is one fought between States or between a State and organized armed group or between such groups – is necessary to determine what body of law applies to the hostilities. The chapter considers whether the prospect of cyber warfare presents particular problems for classification.

This content is available to you

Louise Arimatsu

In this paper I explore some of the ways in which developments in new digital technologies reproduce, and often amplify, the patriarchal structures, practices and culture of contemporary life and, in doing so, operate to silence women through exclusion and through violence. I consider how international human rights law – most notably the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) – can be harnessed to counter both forms of silencing in that each is rooted in gender-based discrimination. The digital gender divide and the rise in online violence against women evidences the failure on the part of States Parties to fully commit to their legal obligations pursuant to CEDAW. Ensuring equality of access to, and use of, digital technologies cannot be anything other than the preconditions to ensuring that women can benefit from, contribute to, and influence the development of digital technologies in a meaningful manner. The digital realm may be a privatised public space that warrants a reconceptualisation of the scope and content of human rights law but the fact that much of the digital infrastructure is owned and controlled by private actors does not absolve States of their human rights responsibilities.