You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items

  • Author or Editor: Malcolm Chapman x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Peter J. Buckley and Malcolm Chapman

You do not have access to this content

Malcolm Chapman, Hanna Gajewska-De Mattos and Christos Antoniou

You do not have access to this content

Peter J. Buckley, Malcolm Chapman, Jeremy Clegg and Hanna Gajewska-De Mattos

The purpose of this paper is to examine ways in which cross-cultural research in international business can use emic-etic approaches more effectively. The majority of research conducted in the field has been etic, while the cross-cultural data used by the researchers have been emic in nature. This resulted in producing ethnocentric results which are biased towards Western perspectives. We call for a re-evaluation of the importance of in-depth qualitative analysis in international business research. We go back to the origins of emic and etic in linguistics and conduct a linguistic and philosophical analysis of these termes to demonstrate that the emic-etic distinction is not helpful for adequately studying cross-cultural data.