You are looking at 1 - 10 of 29 items

  • Author or Editor: Morten Huse x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

This content is available to you

Morten Huse

In the first chapter I introduce the urgency and the main topic of the book: Is there a crisis in academic research, and how do we solve it? True scholarship is under attack, and there is a scholarly ecosystem equilibrium that is supporting a ‘publish or perish’ culture. Fortunately, there are many initiatives to change the equilibrium of this ecosystem. My particular contribution is to present and illustrate a sharing philosophy of research and scholarship.

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

I start this chapter with reflections about the present ‘publish or perish’ culture, and concerns about where our profession is going. I go on to discuss Boyer’s benchmark contribution about scholarship. Finally, I present a scholarly ecosystem consisting of institutions, audience, message, channels, journals and community. Institutions are formed by a neoliberal market ideology with external incentives. The audience is typically a narrow group in academia. The message is incremental; gap spotting and focus is usually short term and based on the past. The channels are premiere journals and they are tenure track driven and create publishing technicians. It is a community where the winner takes it all; it is based on relying on the self.

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

The Academy of Management (AOM) is a global association of scholars and, directly or indirectly, it influences global scholarly practices. It is influencing institutions, the scholarly community, the message, ways of communication and the audience. AOM has a strong momentum, but the direction attributed to it is not always in line with reflections from the AOM leadership and its presidents. The chapter builds on the presidential addresses of the outgoing AOM presidents. The presidents had concerns about the development of the role of scholars and scholarly development. The concerns for the future of academia, the future of scholars, the future of the profession and the future of universities and business schools have always existed, but the seriousness of the POP culture and the urgency to nurture true scholarship seem to be growing. Several of the former presidents argued that theory and practice are not connected.

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

EURAM (The European Academy of Management) aims at being a European-based community of engaged management scholars. It is an open, inclusive and cross-cultural community. EURAM represents diversity and context-specific scholarship and research. Is there a need for European-based research? EURAM’s context-specific characteristics represent a challenge and alternative to the global contributions of the AOM. EURAM has its distinct contributions and character, but I have also seen its contribution as a tugboat that supports the big tankship of the AOM in management research. Can a European-based academy contribute as an alternative or supplement to AOM? EURAM’s presidential activities were aimed at solving challenges facing many academies of management. In this chapter, I mainly lean on two publications I wrote as EURAM president from 2010 to 2012. The first publication was at the beginning of my presidential period, while the second was reflections presented in my presidential outgoing speech.

You do not have access to this content

Morten Huse

Many initiatives have been taken to change the ecosystem equilibrium. They vary depending on the actors behind them. Rationales, objectives and means vary. Several scholars and other actors are crusading against the lack of meaning in the ‘publish or perish’ culture. Some go as far as to argue that a new science of management research is needed; that we need to rethink our professional norms, and cultivate a more scholarly identity. In this chapter, I present and sort various initiatives and suggestions for change – initiatives to make meaning of our research and scholarship. I sort some of these initiatives in line with how they have focused on different parts of the ecosystem: on addressing the institutions, the audience, the message, the channels and the community. The San Francisco Declaration (DORA) and Responsible Research in Business and Management (RRBM) get particular attention. I argue that coordination among the various initiatives is needed.