This chapter examines the tangled question of continuity and change from the point of view of the observance of mobility. The diverse changes in Mediterranean mobility since the upheavals of January 2011 constitute a topic worthy of particular attention. However, an effort has to be made to comprehend the transformed understandings of continuity and change, which are sometimes found in sharp opposition to each other but which also find connections and relations between each other. This work brings at least five different questions together in dialogue: (1) the use of categories. Can the terms ‘refugee’ and ‘irregular migrant’ continue to be used as they were in the past? Globalization studies have suggested new challenges regarding the blurring of such categories. Agamben (1995) has also worked on differentiating the classic idea of the refugee from the question of human rights; (2) forms of continuity. Authors like de Hass and Sigona (2012) talk about a continuity: ‘it is rather unlikely that the revolutions will dramatically change long-term migration patterns’; (3) challenging borders. Authors working on EU borders have identified a rupture in how the Arab Spring has forced the regulation parameters of the EU’s internal borders to change (see, for example, the various programmes in Italy after the Tunisian upheaval); (4) forms of cross-border circulation. Authors working on the Syrian humanitarian crisis have shown how cross-border circulation enhances new humanitarian structure models, especially concerning Turkish borders; and (5) re-scaling. Do cities like Istanbul conform to the kaleidoscope of these post-2011 changes and continuities?
Spaces of Refugee Flight in the Eastern Mediterranean
Edited by Natalia Ribas-Mateos
Ribas-Mateos covers a theoretical challenge set on a complex framework considering the proliferation of spaces concerning the situation of migrants trapped in Libya and on the proliferation on borders and actors when dealing with this topic. The research entails an action research (development of human rights) with a gender perspective. This perspective gives the reader a way into a complex understanding aboutexiting extreme violence. Apart from extreme violence many other concepts end up by making us reflect on the understanding of suffering, distant suffering (view from the distance and the outsider view) when considering the answers to humanitarian crisis, as well as the question of humanitarian accountability and the NGOs advocacy in cases of extreme violence.