You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Pamela Hanrahan x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Pamela F. Hanrahan

Shadow banking involves functions of banking being performed by entities or channels other than banks. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) defined shadow banking in 2011 as ‘the system of credit intermediation that involves entities and activities outside the regular banking system’. That definition only takes us so far. How best to capture the nature of shadow banking, so as to mark out a coherent supervisory domain, has been an ongoing issue since the 2007–08 crisis. This definitional issue both informs and is informed by policy responses to the rapid growth of this part of the financial system over the last two decades. Exchange traded funds (ETFs), like many other forms of collective investments, sit at the still-contested frontier of that domain. In its 2012 Green Paper on shadow banking, the European Commission included ‘investment funds, including Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), that provide credit or are leveraged’ in its list of possible shadow banking entities. Subsequently, the FSB has focused its monitoring efforts on the economic functions performed by shadow banking; and relevant functions include the management of collective investment vehicles with features that make them susceptible to runs. The FSB concluded in 2015 that such vehicles (which include money market funds and hedge funds) represented 60 per cent of all shadow banking, now eclipsing both the size and the rate of growth of the function of securitisation.

You do not have access to this content

Pamela Hanrahan and Ian Ramsay

Over two decades, Australia developed a unique legal and regulatory framework for mutual funds and other collective investments. Utilizing a trust structure, the framework is built around a single “responsible entity” that combines the role of the fund sponsor and adviser with that of the trustee. This chapter explains three key features of that framework: the fiduciary duties imposed on the responsible entity and its officers; the limited role of an independent party to monitor or oversee the responsible entity’s conduct of the fund; and the availability of investor “self-help” mechanisms, including information rights, voting rights, enforcement rights and exit rights.