You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items

  • Author or Editor: Phillip Anthony O'Hara x
Clear All Modify Search
This content is available to you

Phillip Anthony O'Hara

This paper extends the analysis presented by Marc Lavoie in this journal about the relationship between the major schools of heterodox political economy. We argue that the evolution of heterodoxy over the past four decades has seen both specialization and interconnection. The specialization has enabled a degree of detailed analysis of concepts, such as class, demand, institution, innovation, gender, ecology and development. Interconnections between the schools also developed from an early stage. With both forces operating, the specialization promotes clarity of perception and depth of analysis, while the association enables this perception and depth to be linked between the schools. This has led to a degree of cross-fertilisation of themes to form broad concepts. Three such broad concepts are examined that are emerging and link aspects of different schools: contradiction, heterogeneous agents, and uneven development. These broad concepts are important for comprehending the social, institutional and historical forces of political economy, and for linking themes from the various schools of heterodoxy.

You do not have access to this content

Phillip Anthony O’Hara

You do not have access to this content

Phillip Anthony O’Hara

You do not have access to this content

Phillip Anthony O'Hara