You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Roger Andersson x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Åsa Bråmå and Roger Andersson

Beside the more well-known forms of residential segregation, socioeconomic and ethnic/racial, there is a third form that has to do with spatial differentiation in terms of demographic traits such as household or family type and age. In this chapter, we describe the residential patterns of different demographic groups in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1990 and 2014, and discuss how changes in these patterns can be explained, given theory and earlier research within the field. We find that a general decline in levels of demographic segregation has happened during the period, and we suggest that the low building rates after the early 1990s is one important factor behind the decline.

You do not have access to this content

Sako Musterd, Roger Andersson and George Galster

Residents, academics, and policy makers frequently believe that certain neighbourhood compositions impact on opportunities of those who are exposed to them. Social outcomes such as those connected to employment, levels of education and income and the risk of becoming involved in illegal activity, are frequently seen as influenced by the neighbourhood one is living in. However, isolating the so-called ‘neighbourhood effect’ on social outcomes from other impacts on these outcomes is not trivial. In this chapter we address some of the challenges researchers and policy makers are confronted with when getting involved in ‘neighbourhood effects’ debates. Challenges include conceptual issues related to the types of contexts (residential, work, school) and types of compositions (social or other); questions related to the scales to consider, and how to approach the temporal dimension; issues about what mechanisms would produce the effects; and methodological issues (data types, model choices, sources of bias, detecting thresholds).