You are looking at 1 - 10 of 16 items

  • Author or Editor: Simon Deakin x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Simon Deakin and Katharina Pistor

In this research review, Professor Deakin and Professor Pistor include those key articles which highlight the major contributions to, but also the inherent limits of, the legal origin literature. They consider the merits of this approach in the context of three fields of inquiry: the study of comparative law; the analysis of the relation between law and markets; and the understanding of the role of legal systems in social ordering.
This content is available to you

Simon Deakin and Katharina Pistor

You do not have access to this content

Simon Deakin and Katharina Pistor

You do not have access to this content

Simon Deakin and Katharina Pistor

You do not have access to this content

Simon Deakin and Colm McLaughlin

You do not have access to this content

Institutions and innovation: is corporate governance the missing link?

Perspectives from Intellectual Property, Labour, Competition and Corporate Law

Simon Deakin and Andrea Mina

You do not have access to this content

Zoe Adams and Simon Deakin

Beginning in the 1980s, structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) were widely used in the developing world as instruments of economic policy. Imposed by the international financial institutions—primarily the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—as a condition of financial support for countries facing high levels of public debt, SAPs quickly became the basis on which to apply policies of deregulation and privatization. Since the onset of the financial crisis of 2008, policies similar to SAPs are now also being applied in the developed world, above all in Europe in response to the risk of sovereign default in several European Union (EU) member states. Economic adjustment programmes (EAPs) have led to wage cuts, decentralization of collective bargaining, and greater selectivity in employment protection and social security. The rigidity of the core EU institutions and practices—notably the single monetary policy adopted by the economic and monetary union (EMU) in the Maastricht Treaty—made the 2008 crisis particularly difficult for the EU to weather. Until this systemic flaw is recognized and addressed, austerity measures are likely to continue to be seen as the appropriate response to a crisis framed in terms of fiscal irresponsibility.
You do not have access to this content

Simon Deakin and Ralf Rogowski