You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items

  • Author or Editor: Steven Davidoff Solomon x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Steven Davidoff Solomon and Randall S. Thomas

This chapter inquires into law firm quality as measured by outcomes in class action shareholder litigation. The chapter reviews the state of the literature on law firm quality and asks what can be known about plaintiff and defense-side firms in class action shareholder litigation. Several dimensions of the question are explored, such as: How do clients select law firms? What substantive and reputational factors influence law firms’ decisions to represent a client? To what extent does the client influence the outcome? How should a law firm’s performance be measured when its client or potential client, particularly a repeat player defendant in M & A litigation, dictates the law firm’s strategy in handling the litigation? The chapter closes by emphasizing the relatively underdeveloped state of the empirical evidence, offering several directions for future research.

This content is available to you

Edited by Claire A. Hill and Steven Davidoff Solomon

You do not have access to this content

Edited by Claire A. Hill and Steven Davidoff Solomon

Global in scope and written by leading scholars in the field, the Research Handbook on Mergers and Acquisitions is a modern-day survey of the state of M & A. Its chapters explore the history of mergers and acquisitions and also consider the theory behind the structure of modern transaction documentation. The book also address other key M & A issues, such as takeover defenses; judges and practitioners' perspectives on litigation; the appraisal remedy and other aspects of Federal and state law, as well as M & A considerations in the structure of start-ups. This Handbook will be an invaluable resource for scholars, practitioners, judges and legislators.
This content is available to you

Claire A. Hill, Brian J.M. Quinn and Steven Davidoff Solomon

Mergers and acquisitions (M & A) have a rich history in the American economy. Over the course of the past century and a half, merger activity has proceeded in waves, each wave inevitably followed by a regulatory and legal response. Modern merger activity emerged during the late nineteenth century. The succeeding trust era, characterized by monopolies and frenetic acquisition activity, resulted in new regulations in the 1890s and early nineteenth century. Merger activity created vast conglomerates during the 1960s. During the 1970s and 1980s, the leveraged buyout boom led to the development of modern M & A legal doctrine. The late 1980s and 1990s saw the embracing of new participants such as private equity firms. Today, the Internet Age and globalization have led to the current M & A market, characterized by transactions that are global, very large (multi-billion dollar), and sometimes both. The rich history of M & A, with its alternating cycles of activity and quiescence, illustrates an important role for law. The law is both a response to M & A activity, implementing ex post facto regulation, and a guiding force, spurring waves of M & A activity throughout. There is no doubt that as M & A continues its cyclical life, the law, lawyers and those who study the law will continue to play an important part in this economic phenomenon. From its origins – when law mattered little – M & A has become a highly regulated business.