Niechoj analyses the emergence of the modern welfare state - based on the writings of Marx and Polanyi - as a response to the evolution of a market society, and describes the provision of welfare as a collective action problem which is solved by a state that takes responsibility for welfare. The author focuses then on the character of welfare as interventionism and discusses and weighs liberal arguments against welfare.
Page:12
Monograph Chapter
In A Modern Guide to State Intervention
Edited by Nikolaos Karagiannis and John E. King
- Published:
- 8 October 2019
Collection:
Economics 2019
Reference Entry
In The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, Second Edition
Edited by J.E. King
- Published in print:
- 01 Jan 2012
Collection:
Economics 2012
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Apr 2020
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Apr 2017
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Dec 2015
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Apr 2019
Editorial to the special forum
Making the euro area work: proposals for monetary and fiscal reform
Stefan Ederer and Torsten Niechoj
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Apr 2016
Torsten Niechoj and Till van Treeck
First paragraph
The financial market crisis that transformed into a global recession is a challenge for both economic theory and policy. In retrospect, nearly three years after the first signs of the crisis, a few tentative conclusions concerning the appropriateness and effectiveness of the responses to the crisis might be possible. After an initial state of shock, the political system acted forcefully and issued programmes to stabilise both financial sector and the real economy all over the world. Moreover, governments started to talk about an encompassing regulation of the financial sector, which was supported by many economists. This is indeed remarkable compared to what used to be common sense in the years before within advisory bodies – among others the European Commission, the IMF and academic think tanks. Privatisation and liberalisation of markets were, then, thought to be key to increasing the capacity of the economy to absorb shocks and to guarantee high growth rates and economic well-being. Although in that respect politicians and economists obviously did learn from the crisis and began to take seriously alternative ideas which had for a long time been absent in the debates, a ›return to normality‹ is already imminent; the planned fiscal retrenchment programmes, particularly within the European Union, and the deferral of regulatory measures for financial markets are testament to this. The king is dead, long live the king? From today's view it is not clear whether or not, in the longer run, this crisis has really shaken the foundations of economic thinking and policy making.
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Nov 2010
Eckhard Hein, Torsten Niechoj and Engelbert Stockhammer
First paragraph
During the recent decades the financial sectors of developed and developing countries as well as global financial relations have changed remarkably. The overall importance of financial factors for real investment and growth of non-financial business has risen, as has the financial activity of non-financial corporations. Power relations between shareholders in joint stock companies, management, and labourers seem to have changed. The development of new financial instruments, together with the booms in stock market and real estate prices, has increased the potential for wealth-based and debt-financed consumption. As a result of these developments financial fragility (Minsky 1977) has increased. The current financial turbulences, generated by the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the USA and spreading over international financial markets since summer 2007, may be seen as a result of this increased fragility. Finally, global financial relations and conditions have changed with the rapid development in Asia and the associated current account surpluses, in particular in China but also in Japan.
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Nov 2008
Eckhard Hein, Torsten Niechoj and Achim Truger
First paragraph
The world economy is presently suffering from the most severe economic crisis since the Great Depression in the early 1930s. As by now seems to be obvious, the present financial crisis, massive state intervention in the financial markets in order to prevent a melt-down, and fiscal stimulus packages inconceivable even several months ago, mark the failure of an economic policy agenda which might be called ›neo-Liberalism‹. This agenda, broadly speaking, focussed on the deregulation of financial, labour and goods markets and on minimising state intervention. It meant a massive redistribution of income and wealth at the expense of labour and ordinary households, increasing imbalances on the global level and rising financial fragility. The failure of this policy agenda is also a failure of mainstream economic theory which has supported it. In particular those theories which are based on the confidence and firm belief that free markets will be stable and generate a full employment equilibrium – at least in the long run – and that the only role left for macroeconomic policies, in particular monetary policies, is to facilitate and accelerate the adjustment process towards this equilibrium, as for example in the dominating New Consensus Model (NCM), have failed.
Journal Article
In European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention
- Published in print:
- Nov 2009
Page:12