The courtroom is a space filled with judgments that last a lifetime. In sexual offences cases, this judgment might take the form of disbelief in a case relating to rape, inability to express the kind of harm caused, or being face to face with an offender. It could be the loss of liberty, or a life of trauma. With the feminist and spatial turn and relatively new understandings of law’s relationship with space, is it possible to imagine a ‘spatially just’ sexual offences trial built for the bodies of all genders, races and sexualities that must use the courtroom? Despite critical legal thinking’s theoretical achievements in arguing for the Deleuzian ‘doing away’ with authoritarian judgment, the #MeToo era now demands that this task is achieved practically and spatially. This chapter finds that ‘doing away’ with judgment in this context means destruction of the courtroom in favour of a radical new architecture.
In the now official epoch of the ‘Anthropocene’, it is crucial that researchers adopt methodological strategies that are radical enough. This ‘radical enough’ is the demand of an environment which is not just ‘somewhat problematic’, but is falling apart, body-by-body. Only by really stepping into the field that is environmental law can we convincingly tell our story as though we are heading the urgency of the situation, as the more-than-humans we claim to be. Any step into the field is beset by ethical challenges and, occasionally, obstructions. This chapter arises from lessons learned autoethnographically in the field of sexuality and a challenge brought to the ethical basis of thresholds of participation. This personal method, which claims to bridge the chasm between the individual and the collective concern is fraught with ethical challenges, which I claim are not specific to sexuality research. Attractions and transgressions belong to all kinds of more-than-human desiring bodies. This means that a traditional ethical human framework inhibits the possibility of radical methodologies. ‘F#cking’ is not a banal and profane cry of resistance, but a radically orgasmic research ethic underpinning radical methodological strategies for the Anthropocene epoch.