Innovation and Employment
Show Less

Innovation and Employment

Process versus Product Innovation

Charles Edquist, Leif Hommen and Maureen McKelvey

Which kinds of growth lead to increased employment and which do not? This is one of the questions that this important volume attempts to answer. The book explores the complex relationships between innovation, growth and employment that are vital for both research into, and policy for, the creation of jobs.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 2: Specification of Basic Concepts

Charles Edquist, Leif Hommen and Maureen McKelvey

Extract

PART 1/chs1/2 21/5/01 2:00 pm Page 10 2. Specification of basic concepts Definitions may be neither right nor wrong, but they may be useful or not, depending upon their purpose. Conceptual clarity is, however, a virtue because it enables us to evaluate and compare research. For this reason, we will first specify some central innovation concepts in a way that makes them useful for the study of employment effects, which are discussed in Part II (Chapters 3, 4 and 5). The key distinctions used here are between product and process innovations. With respect to product innovations we distinguish between material goods and intangible services and, regarding process innovations, between technological and organizational innovations. The first distinction, between product and process, is well established in the literature, having originated with Joseph Schumpeter. He defined product innovation as ‘the introduction of a new good ... or a new quality of a good’ and process innovation as ‘the introduction of a new method of production ... [or] a new way of handling a commodity commercially’ (Schumpeter, 1911: 66). Dividing products into the categories of goods and services is a long-standing convention in the economics literature. The distinction between technological and organizational process innovations is also well established (see, for example, Utterback and Abernathy, 1975).1 Thus the original vision of Schumpeter and the legacy of heterodox economic theory and research help us advance a differentiated conception of innovation. Certainly, a differentiated conceptualization of innovation would be of great practical utility within evolutionary and institutional...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.