Show Less

National Competitiveness and Economic Growth

The Changing Determinants of Economic Performance in the World Economy

Timo J. Hämäläinen

The current paradigm shift in the world economy is challenging the traditional competitiveness and growth theories with their few explanatory variables. This book offers a more holistic framework to synthesise the key findings of the various branches of competitiveness and growth research. The author illustrates this framework with a new long wave theory of socio-economic development. This theory emphasises the competitiveness and growth benefits of rapid structural adjustment in the rapidly changing techno-economic environment. Based on thorough analysis the author argues that both markets and governments have become less efficient due to the current transformation of the world economy. His empirical data from 22 OECD countries in the 1980s and 1990s illustrates that efficiency and growth-oriented governments have significantly contributed to their countries’ economic success.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Theoretical framework

Timo J. Hämäläinen


Ronald Coase has made two highly influential contributions to economic theory which provide the basis for our theoretical framework (Coase 1937, 1960). In his 1937 paper, Coase set out to discover why there were firms even when economists argued that economic activities were efficiently organized by the market mechanism. He answered this question by arguing that firms exist and grow because there are ‘costs of using the price mechanism’, such as ‘discovering what the relevant prices are’ and ‘negotiating and concluding a separate contract for each exchange transaction’. Firms can avoid these (and other) transaction costs by internalizing the costly transactions into their hierarchies (Coase 1937). The benefits of hierarchical organization led Coase to another fundamental question: ‘why . . . are there any market transactions at all? Why is not all production carried on by one big firm?’ To answer this question Coase referred to Kaldor (1934) and Robinson (1934) to argue that the hierarchical growth of firms is limited by the ‘diminishing returns to management’. He then went on to propose that the economic system can reach an organizational equilibrium when ‘the costs of organizing an extra transaction within the firm are equal to the costs involved in carrying out the transaction in the open market, or, to the costs of organizing by another entrepreneur’. Coase suggested that the organizational equilibrium would evolve over time as a result of changing transaction and ‘organizing’ costs (Coase 1937). In the famous 1960 paper, Coase extended his comparative organizational analysis to study negative...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.