Markets, Planning and Democracy
Show Less

Markets, Planning and Democracy

Essays after the Collapse of Communism

  • New Thinking in Political Economy series

David L. Prychitko

The essays contained herein span over a decade and reflect David Prychitko’s thinking about the role of the market system, and its relation to planning and democratic processes. The collection consists of previously published and unpublished articles written not only for economists but also for an interdisciplinary audience.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 5: Marxisms and Market Processes

David L. Prychitko

Extract

5. Marxisms and market processes* Critics of the Austrian School appeared in many forms, from Schmollerian historicists and Veblenian institutionalists to Keynesian interventionists. Compared to their traditional rivals, Austrians seem furthest removed from Marxism on almost any level we wish to compare. For instance, Austrian methodology is deductive, Marxism’s is dialectical. The Austrians developed a radically subjective theory of value, while Marxians, with their own unique twists, followed Ricardo’s labor theory of value. Austrians champion the capitalist market system and claim the impossibility of socialist planning. Marxians championed socialist planning, and claimed the death of capitalism. The differences between Marxians and Austrians are almost too obvious to list. This chapter has a different task: it will explore some of the contemporary Austrian (and non-Austrian) interpretations of Marxian socialism to suggest to younger Austrians that something might be gained by picking through the rubble that characterizes the crisis in contemporary Marxism. MARX AND THE UTOPIANS Socialism is by no means a homogeneous movement (see Wright, 1986). There are as many visions of socialism as there are socialists, maybe even more. Marx, in his criticism of Saint-Simon, Fourier, Owen, and their disciples, ushered in a self-proclaimed ‘scientific’ (as opposed to ‘utopian’) socialism. Rather than design a detailed blueprint of some imaginary socialist community, and try to convince well-meaning bourgeois types that socialism can be the best of all possible worlds (a practice the utopians were inclined to do – and fail at), Marx would instead thrust forward a radical criticism...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.