Show Less

Markets, Planning and Democracy

Essays after the Collapse of Communism

David L. Prychitko

The essays contained herein span over a decade and reflect David Prychitko’s thinking about the role of the market system, and its relation to planning and democratic processes. The collection consists of previously published and unpublished articles written not only for economists but also for an interdisciplinary audience.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: Thoughts on Austrian Economics, ‘Austro-Punkism’, and Libertarianism

Essays after the Collapse of Communism

David L. Prychitko


15. Thoughts on Austrian economics, ‘Austro-punkism’ and libertarianism The preceding chapters were written with a peculiar, overarching normative vision of mine. I would be untruthful were I to claim that I wrote them in a manner totally divorced from my normative concerns. My criticisms, for the most part, are immanent – attempting to get within the framework of Marxism or that of my Austrian colleagues, to determine whether their own arguments logically support their grand claims, whether or not those claims favor self-managed socialism, which I have no special fondness for, or anarcho-capitalism, which lies closer to my own sentiments. As I mentioned in several places throughout the book, against a handful of my left-wing interpreters and critics, my vision is, of course, neither a Marxist nor generally a socialist vision. I have no interest in rehabilitating Marx, nor in envisioning some new system of decentralized socialism. Perhaps misinterpretation is a potential peril with immanent critique: if one takes an opposing argument seriously, others might wrongly interpret that as an effort to improve those arguments – in this case, the Marxist and post-Marxist claims regarding the viability and desirability of socialist selfmanagement. Actually, I’m more fascinated by the responses I’ve received directly, and also indirectly through the hallowed ‘verbal tradition’, from my Austrian colleagues. For here is the other side of the perils associated with immanent critique: if one strongly criticizes arguments within one’s own school of thought, one’s allies might wrongly interpret that as an effort to destroy those...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.