A Post Keynesian Perspective on Twenty-First Century Economic Problems
Show Less

A Post Keynesian Perspective on Twenty-First Century Economic Problems

Edited by Paul Davidson

This book explores key economic problems and new policies for the global economy of the 21st century. The contributors discuss to what extent past policy errors were due to the incompetence of policymakers, and highlight problems including: international payments imbalances and currency crises, volatile security markets, inflation, achieving full employment, income distribution and alleviating individuals and nations of poverty.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 2: Neomonetarist dreams and realities: a review of the Brazilian experience

Alfredo Saad-Filho and Lecio Morais

Extract

2. Neomonetarist dreams and realities: a review of the Brazilian experience Alfredo Saad-Filho and Lecio Morais* This chapter reviews the performance and changing structure of the Brazilian economy during the 1990s. This was a remarkable decade, partly because of the economy’s dismal growth rates,1 and partly because of the changes in the system of accumulation.2 The most important change was the abandonment of import-substituting industrialization for a new system of accumulation, based on the microeconomic integration of Brazilian industry and finance into transnational capital. There were two main reasons for this change. First, in the late 1980s most analysts argued that Brazilian import-substituting industrialization faced three insuperable problems: the fiscal crisis of the state; the perceived inefficiency of the manufacturing, service and financial sectors; and the continuing difficulty of creating a dynamic national system of innovation. As a result, economic growth rates tended to decline, and inflation to accelerate, until the accumulation process was largely blocked after the 1982 international debt crisis.3 Second, in the early 1990s a new consensus gradually emerged across the Brazilian elite. It was argued that the neomonetarist economic policies associated with the Washington Consensus and the predominance of finance over industrial interests provided the best, or even the only, prospect of long-term economic growth. This strategic shift was validated by strong pressure from the Washington institutions and foreign and Brazilian transnational capital, and by the seemingly outstanding economic performance of Argentina, Mexico, South Korea and other countries. This policy shift was...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.