Globalization and Economic Development
Show Less

Globalization and Economic Development

Essays in Honour of J. George Waardenburg

Edited by Servaas Storm and C. W.M. Naastepad

Globalization is widely regarded as a means not only of ensuring efficiency and growth, but also of achieving equity and development for those countries operating in the global economy. The book argues that this perception of globalization as the road to development has lost its lustre. The experience of the 1990s belied expectation of the gains, such as faster growth and reduced poverty, which could be achieved through closer integration in the world economy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Income distribution, growth and protectionism in Sub-Saharan Africa and the case of Zimbabwe

Jørn Rattsø


1 Jørn Rattsø 1. INTRODUCTION Most of colonial Africa had strong government regulation of the economy, including foreign trade and capital flows. This is an important background to understand the present debate about liberalization and globalization in Africa. The issue is not to return to the laissez-faire policies prevailing before socialist independence movements got rid of colonial rule. The new independent governments of the 1960s inherited a system of controls, and the regulatory apparatus was well designed to promote national planning and public sector dominance towards new goals. The governments chose to use the controls to protect industry and discriminate agriculture. Industrialization was the word of the day. The policy aimed at transferring the agricultural surplus to industrial investment. The attention here is concentrated on this interplay between agriculture and industry, rural and urban. With hindsight we can conclude that the independent governments generally were not successful in arranging the interaction between rural and urban to generate sustainable growth. Productivity in agriculture stagnated and industry never took over as an engine of growth. In this perspective, recent liberalization reforms can be seen as an acknowledgement of this failure and an attempt to find a new growth model. In a political context, the urban and anti-export bias has been understood to be based on a separation between urban and rural constituencies. Bates (1981) argues that governments based their support on urban groups and arranged regulations to keep food prices low, and thereby urban industries profitable. Marketing boards and protectionism...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.