Globalization and Economic Development
Show Less

Globalization and Economic Development

Essays in Honour of J. George Waardenburg

Edited by Servaas Storm and C. W.M. Naastepad

Globalization is widely regarded as a means not only of ensuring efficiency and growth, but also of achieving equity and development for those countries operating in the global economy. The book argues that this perception of globalization as the road to development has lost its lustre. The experience of the 1990s belied expectation of the gains, such as faster growth and reduced poverty, which could be achieved through closer integration in the world economy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Liberalization and economic performance in developing and transition countries

Lance Taylor


Lance Taylor 1. INTRODUCTION As seen from the year 2000, economic policy in developing and postsocialist economies during the preceding 10–15 years had one dominating theme. Packages aimed at liberalizing the balance of payments, on both current and capital accounts, showed up throughout Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia, and even in parts of Africa. Along with large but volatile foreign capital movements (often but not always in connection with privatization of state enterprises), this wave of external deregulation was the central feature of ‘globalization’ for the nonindustrialized world. In two recent research projects, the implications of external liberalization have been investigated through the use of quantified narrative histories for a number of countries, based on methodologies to decompose and analyse changes over time in effective demand, productivity growth, employment and the sectoral/functional income distribution. The studies were done by nationals of the countries concerned – all highly respected internationally and at home. They appear in collections edited by Ganuza, Taylor and Vos (2000) and Taylor (2000).1 The former concentrates on countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, while the latter includes papers on Argentina, Colombia, Cuba, India, South Korea (hereafter simply ‘Korea’), Mexico, Russia, Turkey and Zimbabwe. The results are sobering. At their infrequent best, liberalization packages have generated modest improvements in economic growth and distributional equity; at their worst they have been associated with sharp deteriorations in economic performance (despite higher capital inflows). The obvious implication is that the liberalization strategy needs to be seriously...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.