Show Less

Instruments for Climate Policy

Limited versus Unlimited Flexibility

Edited by Johan Albrecht

Instruments for Climate Policy focuses on economic and political aspects related to the recent proposals and the debate on limits in flexibility, and discusses EU and US perspectives on climate policy instruments and strategies. This is followed by chapters on economic efficiency and the use of flexible instruments as well as contributions to the debate on ‘when flexibility’, on the arguments behind the EU ceilings proposal and on voluntary approaches to climate policy. One of the main conclusions reached with respect to proposals for limiting flexibility is the need to evaluate simultaneously their economic, ecological and international political consequences. The authors include both important policymakers and leading academics in the area.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Supplementary in the European carbon emission market

Johan Eyckmans and Jan Cornillie


5. Supplementarity in the European carbon emission market Johan Eyckmans and Jan Cornillie 1. INTRODUCTION The European Commission’s Green Paper on greenhouse gas emission trading within the European Union (EC, 2000) advocates the use of tradable emission permits within the EU as a way of increasing the cost-efficiency of European climate policy. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading is one of the ‘flexible mechanisms’ provided for in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on the reduction of GHGs. The Kyoto Protocol1 stipulates that this international emissions trading mechanism can only come into action after the start of the ‘first commitment period’, hence from 2008 onwards. The EC’s Green Paper calls, however, for installing a European GHG emissions market earlier than this, from 2005 onwards. This exclusively EU emissions market would have several advantages. First, it would give EU companies some time to get used to the permit trading system. Since Europe has little experience compared to the USA with emission permits, it is often feared that European companies would not be ready to compete on an international GHG emissions market in 2008. Second, it would give the EU an opportunity to show to the secretariat of the Kyoto Protocol some ‘demonstrable progress’ towards the achievement of the 8 per cent emissions abatement target for the European bubble. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the EC’s Green Paper shows that this EU GHG emissions market could lead to substantial cost savings compared to uncoordinated national climate change policies. According to simulations with the PRIMES...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.