Show Less

Applied Evolutionary Economics

New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques

Edited by Pier Paolo Saviotti

The expert contributors to this book examine recent developments in empirical methods and applied simulation in evolutionary economics. Using examples of innovation and technology in industry, it is the first book to address the following questions in a systematic manner: Can evolutionary economics use the same empirical methods as other research traditions in economics?; Is there a need for empirical methods appropriate to the subject matter chosen?; What is the relationship between appreciative theorising, case studies and more structured empirical methods?; and What is the relationship of modelling and simulation to empirical analysis?
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: ‘Leaping Across the Mountains, Bounding Over the Hills’: Punctualism and Gradualism in Economic Development

Witold Kwasnicki


Witold Kwasnicki What is a mode of development of evolutionary processes? In 1972 Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldridge published a paper on ‘Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism’, and since that time biologists have been engaged in vigorous discussion on two conflicting views of modes of natural evolution, namely gradualism and punctualism. Similar discussion can be noted in economics on modes of economic development in the presence of innovation. It seems that there is evidence that both kinds of development can be identified in the sphere of socioeconomic processes. We will use the simulation approach to support our suggestions that: 1. Average characteristics of development can be considered as continuously changing (so it can support gradualism) but the frontier of development is far from being continuous, and from that point of view evolution ought to be considered as punctuated. Using the metaphor of adaptive landscape we can show that biological population is able to evolve (drift) from the local adaptive landscape down the valley and from there gradually evolve up a higher hill (that is, the evolution can be considered as gradual). But drift is very improbable in the socio-economic evolution mainly because of specificity of socio-economic processes (especially the possibility of pre-evaluation of inventions and using in practice only those which allow for potential progress). Therefore economic evolution is not gradual but ought to be seen as a combination of gradual development (in the phase of climbing the local peak in the adaptive landscape)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.