Catch-up and Crisis in Korea
Show Less

Catch-up and Crisis in Korea

Wontack Hong

Whilst the process of catch-up in Korea – led by export-oriented growth – has been rapid and, in a sense, very successful, it has also been subject to turbulence, not least in a crisis of near bankruptcy that has dramatically revealed its Achilles heel. Informed by the 1997 crisis, Wontack Hong writes a new history of the Korean economy; one that seeks to understand export-oriented catch-up in newly industrialized countries (NICs) whilst offering a realistic appraisal and forewarning of the pitfalls which could signal self-destruction.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 8: The Legacy of Korea’s Credit Rationing System

Wontack Hong

Extract

8. The legacy of Korea’s credit rationing system 1. A REPRESSED FINANCIAL REGIME In Korea, commercial banks were the principal intermediary between savers and borrowers, and yet bank credits were provided at below market rates, which made credit rationing unavoidable. Indeed, credit rationing served as one of the most important policy tools to carrying out exportoriented growth strategy in Korea (see Hong 1986a, 1986b). According to the McKinnon-Shaw models, the growth-maximizing real deposit rate of interest is the competitive free-market equilibrium rate (see the summary by Fry, 1993: 8–11). The policy implications of these models for the financially repressed economy are that growth can be increased by abolishing interest rate ceilings, by reducing the rate of inflation, by abandoning credit rationing, by eliminating the reserve requirement tax (for example, by paying the competitive interest rate on required reserves), and by ensuring that the financial system operates competitively under conditions of free entry. Higher real deposit interest rates not only increase financial deepening but also raise national savings, increase the supply of available investment resources, accelerate the rate of physical capital accumulation, and hence raise the equilibrium rate of national investment. The financial liberalization undertaken in Korea in the 1980s was rather moderate. Interest rates as well as the asset management of financial institutions continued to be controlled, and the government still heavily intervened in money and capital markets. However, since it is a fact that Korea could achieve sustained high growth with ever-rising savings propensity under a repressed...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.