Show Less

Globalization and Institutions

Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game

Edited by Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack

This volume investigates the relationship between economic globalization and institutions, or global governance, challenging the common assumption that globalization and institutionalization are essentially processes which exclude each other. Instead, the contributors to this book show that globalization is better perceived as a dual process of institutional change at the national level, and institution building at the transnational level. Rich, supporting empirical evidence is provided along with a theoretical conceptualization of the main actors, mechanisms and conditions involved in trickle-up and trickle-down trajectories through which national institutional systems are being transformed and transnational rules emerge.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: Theoretical Building Blocks for a Research Agenda Linking Globalization and Institutions

Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack


Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack The objective of this chapter is double. First, we take stock of the ways in which the institutionalist literature deals with issues of institutional change and institutional emergence. Then, we try to show how the connection we make between globalization and institutions opens up new theoretical directions. Under the label ‘institutionalism’ or ‘institutional theory’, one finds a rather heterogeneous body of literature originating from different disciplines and based on rather distinct ontological assumptions about human behaviour. Building upon Hall and Taylor (1996) and Djelic (2001) we identify three main and distinct perspectives on institutions that we label respectively ‘rational choice’, ‘cultural’ and ‘historical’. TOWARDS A TYPOLOGY OF INSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENTS The ‘rational choice’ perspective is found predominantly amongst economists and political scientists – particularly for the latter group in the international relations literature. This perspective tends to focus on formal and structural political and economic institutions. The existence of institutions is accounted for in an essentially functionalist way – institutions are there because they solve problems for actors. Institutional order is seen as arising from negotiations between rational actors pursuing preferences or interests that will in a particular case be better served through coordinated and institutionalized action (Crouch and Streeck 1997). Self-interested actors make decisions and create institutions which they believe most efficient in a particular situation (North 1981; Williamson 1985). From this perspective, both the origins of those frames and action within them reflect a ‘logic of expected consequences’ (March and Olsen 1998). ‘Cultural’ and ‘historical’ perspectives...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.