Show Less

Growth and Development in the Global Economy

Edited by Harry Bloch

What are the forces behind the increasing globalization of economic life? How does globalization affect the functioning of national economies? What difficulties confront government policymakers in dealing with the global economy? These issues are addressed in this volume by leading specialists. The contributors present a range of unique and varied perspectives from which they consider aspects of the increasing integration of economic life, exploring implications for the functioning of domestic markets in a rapidly changing global economy. The result is a collection of insights that provide a framework for understanding globalization as an economic phenomenon.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Globalization and the Terms of Trade: The Glass Ceiling Hypothesis

David Sapsford and V. N. Balasubramanyam


David Sapsford and V. N. Balasubramanyam INTRODUCTION This chapter is concerned with a recent development within the topic that has become known as the ‘fallacy of composition’. The basic notion in the fallacy of composition literature is that while certain macroeconomic policies may appear appropriate when viewed from a partial equilibrium perspective, the very same policies can in fact turn out to be entirely inappropriate once general equilibrium effects are taken into account (see Mayer (2001) for a detailed literature review). Although the fallacy of composition was originally introduced by Bhagwati in the 1950s in the context of his notion of immiserizing growth, the concept has been utilized extensively in the analysis of the consequences of International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank stabilization and structural adjustment policies for the terms of trade faced by primary commodity dependent less developed countries (LDCs). For example, Sapsford and Singer (1998) argued that policy ‘advice’ of the World Bank structural adjustment and/or IMF stabilization sort that might be good when given to a single country may turn out to be bad when given to many countries simultaneously as part of an overall, and often similar, development strategy. Sapsford, Sarkar and Singer (1992) report some evidence to suggest that the more or less simultaneous policy ‘advice’ to increase primary commodity exports given by the international institutions during the 1980s to a number of sub-Saharan African economies under structural adjustment/stabilization type programs may have been self-defeating from the revenue perspective.1 Such a simultaneous increase in...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.