The Economic Valuation of the Environment and Public Policy
Show Less

The Economic Valuation of the Environment and Public Policy

A Hedonic Approach

Noboru Hidano

The importance of the hedonic valuation approach in public policy evaluation and environmental value estimation is now widely accepted. This book is especially designed to illustrate the basic assumptions of the hedonic approach and highlight the strengths and weaknesses associated with it. Combining rigorous theoretical analysis, detailed empirical studies and an extensive history of hedonic valuation, the book is both a good introductory text to the field and a precise yet comprehensive aid for professionals and practitioners alike.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Comparison with Contingent Valuation Method

A Hedonic Approach

Noboru Hidano


MEANING OF COMPARISON In this chapter, we compare the value estimated by the hedonic price method and the values estimated by another method. As we discussed in the previous chapters, hedonic price measures should give us accurate information from theoretical and empirical viewpoints. However, it is difficult to ascertain the real values using only one method because each method has its shortcomings. We shall explain these cases by comparing the values of environmental goods obtained using the hedonic and the contingent valuation method. There has been little previous research on such a comparison. The most notable example is Brookshire et al.’s (1982) air pollution work, and there are other examples concerning earthquake risk in California, in the United States. We carried out a comparison study using an example of water environment in Japan (Hiramatsu and Hidano, 1989). The hedonic approach has already been accepted by major economists as a powerful tool for evaluating local public goods. Comparisons between the different valuation methods have, in the past, mainly been carried out in an attempt to justify the stated preference approach, rather than to justify the hedonic approach. The CVM value may include biases, which have been fully discussed by many authors, including Mitchell and Carson (1989), Hanley and Spash (1993), Garrod and Willis (1999), Hidano (1999), and Bateman and Willis (1999) and we should therefore take care when discussing the CVM results. A careful comparison of the hedonic with the CVM results should employ the ranges of the hedonic...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.