The OECD and European Welfare States
Show Less

The OECD and European Welfare States

Edited by Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler

The OECD and European Welfare States comprises 14 country studies considering OECD recommendations and their implementation in Western European welfare states, an analysis of the internal processes in the OECD, a theoretical introduction and a concluding comparative chapter. The overall results show a large degree of consistency in OECD analyses and recommendations, though little efficacy is revealed. The authors of this book have compiled a major contribution to the analysis of the impact of international organisations on national welfare states, widening the scope of traditional analyses of national welfare state development.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: France: moving reluctantly in the OECD's direction

Marina Serré and Bruno Palier


8. France: moving reluctantly in the OECD’s direction Marina Serré and Bruno Palier INSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT The French welfare state reflects for the most part the Bismarckian tradition: in France, most benefits are earnings-related, entitlement is conditional upon a record of contribution, and the contributions of both employers and employees constitute the system’s primary source of financing. The French social welfare system expanded from 1945 to the 1980s, and saw the development of a particular and cohesive set of non-state agencies that fall under the rubric la Sécurité sociale. The system is extremely fragmented. It is divided into a number of different sectors covering different policy domains: health care, old age, family and unemployment.1 The system is also segmented into different schemes covering different occupational groups (for example, there are more than 600 different pension schemes: for those employed in industry and trade, for the self-employed, for civil servants, for public firms’ salaried workers, for farmers and so on). Instead of a unified system covering the entire population (as found in universalistic regimes), the system has developed via the addition of specific, particularistic and autonomous schemes for different occupational groups. During the system’s expansion from the late 1940s to the late 1960s, many professions defended their specific benefits and resisted integration into the Régime général, the most important regime covering salaried workers from trade and industry. The French welfare state therefore deserves the ‘corporatist-conservative’ label given to it by Esping-Andersen (1990). Since the mid-1970s, each...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.