The OECD and European Welfare States
Show Less

The OECD and European Welfare States

Edited by Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler

The OECD and European Welfare States comprises 14 country studies considering OECD recommendations and their implementation in Western European welfare states, an analysis of the internal processes in the OECD, a theoretical introduction and a concluding comparative chapter. The overall results show a large degree of consistency in OECD analyses and recommendations, though little efficacy is revealed. The authors of this book have compiled a major contribution to the analysis of the impact of international organisations on national welfare states, widening the scope of traditional analyses of national welfare state development.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Little contention: Switzerland and the OECD

Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler


Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler THE SWISS WELFARE STATE – INSTITUTIONAL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT In international perspective, the development of the Swiss welfare state began early but became delayed thereafter. Only recently has it caught up with the typical continental welfare state. Swiss welfare state development began early with the government introduction of a factory law in 1877 regulating labour conditions, among them child labour and maximum working time. However, between 1890 and World War II, the expansion of the national welfare state was, to a large extent, stalled. This was mainly due to the failure of the governments to get major new laws accepted in popular votes. Using the three-fold classification of welfare states (Esping-Andersen 1990), until World War II, Switzerland could be classified as a liberal welfare state: there were many means-tested benefits, subsidies to private insurance instead of public schemes financed via compulsory contributions or taxes, and few universal schemes. By and by, Switzerland added other schemes to this liberal core. These can be classified as social democratic or conservative. The first pillar of the pension scheme, introduced in 1948, is social democratic: it is a general insurance for all citizens that covers the basic needs of pensioners. This scheme is highly redistributive since contributions are a direct function of income (except in the very high income brackets), while the variation of maximum to minimum benefits is only two to one. The second pillar of the pension scheme (effective 1985) is conservative: it covers employed people and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.