The OECD and European Welfare States
Show Less

The OECD and European Welfare States

Edited by Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler

The OECD and European Welfare States comprises 14 country studies considering OECD recommendations and their implementation in Western European welfare states, an analysis of the internal processes in the OECD, a theoretical introduction and a concluding comparative chapter. The overall results show a large degree of consistency in OECD analyses and recommendations, though little efficacy is revealed. The authors of this book have compiled a major contribution to the analysis of the impact of international organisations on national welfare states, widening the scope of traditional analyses of national welfare state development.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: OECD views on Greek welfare: not European enough

Blanca Ananiadis


Blanca Ananiadis INTRODUCTION: THE GREEK WELFARE STATE In Greece, the twenty-first century opened with a broad wave of welfare reform proposals. This process, begun in the mid-1990s, first aimed at rectifying existing economic and financial ‘structural imbalances’ (a concept used in all OECD surveys). In fact, most social reforms were either constituent elements of (labour market, social security), or resource-dependent upon (education, health), the financial restructuring that paved the way to successful entry into the Eurozone. Since the mid-1990s, the social agenda has become more decisively reformist. Negotiated and still negotiable, politically costly and plagued by the uncertainty of its outcomes, reform plans have helped to further unveil a deep layer of ‘structural imbalances’ in the Greek socio-economic configuration. Until recently, Greece represented a near ideal-type ‘Southern-syndrome’ welfare state, referring to the categorisation proposed by Ferrera (1996) (an addition to Esping-Andersen’s well-known ‘three-worlds’ typology). Frequently cited in the welfare literature, that syndrome refers to a particular mixture of nominal universalism in health care and dualism (i.e. sharp disparities in benefits resulting in ‘hyper-protected’ and unprotected sectors) and fragmentation in occupationally-based income maintenance and pension systems. In the Greek case, this dualism was exacerbated by a culture of politically endowed privileges associated to clientelistic practices, centralised welfare provision and consistently low – when compared to both European and OECD standards – levels of social expenditure. Pension-heavy social protection (around 50 per cent of the social budget since the early 1980s), restricted and meagre unemployment benefits, and the narrow scope of social services provided...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.