The Property Tax, Land Use and Land Use Regulation
Show Less

The Property Tax, Land Use and Land Use Regulation

  • Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State–local Finance series

Edited by Dick Netzer

Dick Netzer, a leading public finance economist specializing in state and local issues and urban government, brings together in this comprehensive volume essays by top scholars connecting the property tax with land use. They explore the idea that the property tax is used as a partial substitute for land use regulation and other policies designed to affect how land is utilized. Like many economists, the contributors see some type of property taxation as the more efficient means of helping to shape land use. Some of the essays analyze a conventional property tax, while others consider radically different systems of property taxation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 9: The rise of private neighborhood associations: revolution or evolution?

William A. Fischel

Extract

9. The rise of private neighborhood associations: revolution or evolution? William A. Fischel In the previous chapter, Robert Nelson suggests that states should replace municipalities with private community associations. As his data show, his goal seems to be well under way to fruition. Developer-designed community associations have grown astoundingly since 1970. They were led first by the condominium boom, which required a collective body to govern common areas and regulate neighborhood property, but they changed in the 1980s into an enormous and continuing growth in private governance of conventional single-family subdivisions. Nelson suggests that state governments realize that neighborhood associations are replacing municipalities. Municipalities, at least those smaller than counties, should face the music and go out of business, yielding their authority to provide local services and land use regulation to private neighborhood associations. There is a very different way of looking at private community associations. Positively, neighborhood associations have not displaced any municipality or induced it to give up its regulatory powers. It appears that community associations are not substitutes for municipal governance, but complements to it. The rise of neighborhood associations seems to be a response to an increasing demand for protection of home values. Homeowners appear to want both more zoning and more private regulation. They do not seem to want to substitute private for public regulation. Normatively, it probably would be a bad idea entirely to replace municipal governance with private governance. This is not because private governance is undesirable, but because municipalities provide an...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.