Show Less

Informal Governance in the European Union

Edited by Thomas Christiansen and Simona Piattoni

This book addresses an issue of paramount importance concerning the politics of the European Union: aspects of governance and policy making in the EU that are labelled ‘informal’. Much of the literature on the EU focuses on the formal facets of EU politics, but uniquely, the subject matter within this book deals with informal aspects such as: the role of personal relationships, the presence of non-hierarchical policy-networks and non-institutional channels of interest representation, and the relevance of the unwritten rules and routines which govern these aspects of EU politics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Common Market institutions, fraud and informal networks

Carolyn M. Warner


1 Carolyn M. Warner INTRODUCTION International politico-economic organizations such as the EU are expected to lower barriers to trade, raise the efficiency of economic exchanges as well as promote economic and political development and cooperation. Yet it is possible that international organizations are just as likely to promote, as sideeffects, various forms of fraud. Recent instances of possible fraud (and corruption) in the EU’s main administrative body (the Commission) serve to highlight the vulnerability of international organizations to illicit financial practices. Is fraud the result of national patterns being brought into the international arena, or a negative externality inherent in any international organization? How do we analyse the occurrence of fraud in the EU? Is the EU, in this regard, one of several instances of international organizations or is there something about the EU’s particular institutional configuration – for example the diffusion of informal governance mechanisms – which makes it particularly prone to fraud? This chapter will explore answers to these questions by looking at various policy areas, but particularly at agricultural and cohesion policies. DEFINITIONS AND HYPOTHESES To study fraud, we need to know what it is. Fraud is usually defined as the wrongful appropriation of funds in the private sector, or by a private actor against public funds, while corruption is defined as ‘behavior by a public servant, whether elected or appointed, which involves a deviation from his or her formal duties because of reasons of personal gain’ (LaPalombara 1994, p. 328; see also Klitgaard 1988, pp. 20–24). Corrupt...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.