Re-examining Monetary and Fiscal Policy for the 21st Century
Show Less

Re-examining Monetary and Fiscal Policy for the 21st Century

Philip Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer

This book provides a much-needed re-examination of monetary and fiscal policies, their application in the real world and their potential for macroeconomic policy in the 21st century. It provides a detailed discussion and critique of the ‘new consensus' in macroeconomics along with the monetary and fiscal policies encapsulated within it.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 5: Does the Stock of Money Have Any Casual Significance?

Philip Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer

Extract

5. Does the stock of money have any causal significance? 1 INTRODUCTION In the ‘new consensus macroeconomics’ discussed in earlier chapters, it was evident that the stock of money is seen to operate as a mere residual in the economic process. Others have commented on the absence of the stock of money in many current debates over monetary policy. For example, Laidler (1999) states that ‘the Quarterly Projection Model which nowadays provides the analytic background against which Bank [of Canada] policies are designed, includes no variable to represent this crucial aggregate [stock of money]’ (p. 1). King (2002) makes the case in even stronger language; he argues that, ‘as price stability has become recognised as the central objective of central banks, the attention actually paid to money stock by central banks has declined’. Surprisingly perhaps, ‘as central banks became more and more focused on achieving price stability, less and less attention was paid to movements in money. Indeed, the decline of interest in money appeared to go hand in hand with success in maintaining low and stable inflation’ (p. 162). This has prompted a number of contributions that, wittingly or perhaps unwittingly, have attempted to ‘reinstate’ a more substantial role for money. In this chapter we argue that these attempts to ‘reinstate’ money in current macroeconomic thinking entails two important implications. The first is that they contradict an important theoretical property of the ‘new consensus’ macroeconomic model, namely that of dichotomy between the monetary and the real...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.