Show Less

The Korean Economy Beyond the Crisis

Edited by Duck-Koo Chung and Barry Eichengreen

Providing an integrated analysis of the event and its consequences, the chapters in the book consider the causes of the crisis, the response of the US government and International Monetary Fund, adjustments in the Korean monetary and fiscal policies, and the success of financial and corporate restructuring. The concluding chapters bring the story up-to-date, describing the aftermath of the crisis and assessing whether there has been sufficient reform to facilitate the country’s recovery and growth.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Social impact of the crisis

Joung-Woo Lee


Joung-Woo Lee INTRODUCTION Without question, the social impact of Korea’s economic and financial crisis was profound. ‘Restructuring,’ a concept unfamiliar to Koreans who for several decades had been accustomed to robust economic growth and full employment, became a household word. The shock of large-scale unemployment cast a pall over society. The greatest shock was probably the crumbling of the myth of sustained economic growth and heightened certainty about whether government-led growth would resume. Corporate bankruptcies, rising unemployment, and the widening gap between rich and poor were prominent features of the Korean landscape in the years following the crisis. Although the government announced at the end of 2000 that it would repay the IMF loan ahead of schedule, many citizens remain unconvinced that substantial economic improvement has taken place and regard the crisis as still underway. Korea was not the only country to experience profound economic changes after turning to the IMF. Income inequality became more severe and poverty became more widespread in many of the countries that have turned to the IMF for help (Chossudovsky, 1997; Pieper and Taylor, 1998; Pastor, 1987; Garuda, 2000; Vreeland, 2001). There is a question, of course, of whether the IMF program causes the poverty, or whether the shock to the economy that forces the government to turn to the IMF is in fact responsible for the deterioration in living standards and the rise in inequality. But there is no question about the existence of the correlation.1 Chen and Ravallion (2000) have estimated that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.