Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms
Show Less

Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms

Per Davidsson, Frédéric Delmar and Johan Wiklund

In this book, three leading scholars have integrated some of their most important research in order to answer these questions on firm growth. The result is a volume that builds on studies of many thousands of firms in several different projects. It offers deep insights into the firm growth phenomenon and how it can be studied.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: High-Growth Firms and Their Contribution to Employment: The Case of Sweden 1987–96

Per Davidsson, Frédéric Delmar and Johan Wiklund


1 Per Davidsson, Frédéric Delmar INTRODUCTION The dynamics of job creation have in recent years attracted increased interest on the part of academics as well as policy-makers. In connection to this, a number of studies carried out in various countries have concluded that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a very large and/or growing role as job creators (Baldwin and Picot, 1995; Birch, 1979; Davidsson, Lindmark and Olofsson, 1993; 1994; 1995; 1998a; 1998b; Fumagelli and Mussati, 1993; Kirchhoff and Phillips, 1988; Picot and Dupuy, 1998, Spilling, 1995; for further reference to studies carried out in a large number of countries see also Aiginger and Tichy, 1991; ENSR, 1994; Loveman and Sengenberger, 1991; OECD, 1987; Storey and Johnson, 1987). While most researchers agree on the importance of SMEs, there is some controversy as regards whether their great role in job creation is mainly a result of many small start-ups and incremental expansions, or if a small minority of high growth SMEs contribute the lion’s share of new employment. This is known as the ‘mice vs. gazelles’ or ‘flyers vs. trundlers’ debate. Storey and Birch strongly advocate the position that the small group of high growth SMEs are the real job creators in the UK and US, respectively (Birch and Medoff, 1994; Storey, 1994; Storey and Johnson, 1987) whereas, for example, the Davidsson et al. research in Sweden (cf. above) gives more support for the ‘mice’ hypothesis. The different views may in part be due to real country differences. It...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.