Show Less

A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists Second Edition

Edited by Philip Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer

This is a thoroughly updated and revised edition of the first, and definitive, biographical dictionary of dissenting economists. It is an extensive and authoritative guide to economists both past and present, providing biographical, bibliographical and critical information on over 100 economists working in the non-neoclassical traditions broadly defined. It includes entries on, amongst others, radical economists, Marxists, post-Keynesians, behaviourists, Kaleckians and institutionalists. The book demonstrates the extent and richness of the radical heterodox tradition in economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content



EVINE (born 1948) David Levine was educated at the University of Wisconsin and Yale University where he received his Ph.D. degree in 1973. He joined the Yale Economics Department in that year, and remained there, first as an Assistant then as an Associate Professor, until denied tenure in 1980. In 1981, he accepted a position as Professor of Economics and Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Denver, a position he occupied until 1987 when he moved to the University’s Graduate School of International Studies. Levine’s main contributions in economics fall into four broad headings: the theory of value; the theory of capital accumulation and economic growth; the theory of need; and normative political economy. Levine’s distinctive approach to economic theory developed under the influence of Hegel and Marx. His first book, Economic Studies (1977), explores the conceptual structure of classical and modern economic theory. Following the method sometimes employed by Marx in his Theories of Surplus Value, Levine develops an internal critique of the theory of value and capital, defining the conceptual issues underlying and accounting for analytical arguments. The main theme of the book can be briefly summarized in the following way. The important analytical errors in economic theory are made for reasons. Uncovering these reasons is more important than correcting the mistakes. The reasons have to do with implicit and explicit conceptual arguments. Errors arise because theorists attempt to hold inconsistent arguments simultaneously within a single analytical-conceptual construct. Theorists attempt to say...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.