Capitalism in Evolution
Show Less

Capitalism in Evolution

Global Contentions – East and West

Edited by Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Makoto Itoh and Nobuharu Yokokawa

Contributors to this volume argue that to understand capitalism in evolution, this diversity of systems and approaches must be taken into account and their individual evolutions analysed. This book represents a major understanding of the evolution of capitalism in the twenty first century and brings together a distinguished group of experts with perspectives from America, Europe and Japan.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 4: The development of the market economy and the formation of voice

Kiichiro Yagi

Extract

4. The development of the market economy and the formation of voice Kiichiro Yagi THE SMITHIAN THEORY OF THE DIVISION OF LABOUR In developing his theory of natural selection, it is well known that Charles Darwin was inspired by Thomas Malthus’s Essay on the Principle of Population (1798). Darwin extended the necessary struggle for life from Malthusian population theory to the zoological and botanical spheres. But another element of natural selection, the generation of diversity, is missing in Malthusian theory. Accordingly, some researchers seek another inspiration for Darwinian theory in the classical idea of the division of labour. Although there is no evidence of Darwin reading Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations (1776), Darwin was acquainted with the idea of ‘division of labour’ as this idea was familiar to his contemporaries (Hodgson, 1993, ch. 4). We shall not go into the entangled relations between biology and economics here. But it is possible to regard Smith’s theory of the division of labour as an origin for evolutionary economics. Consider Smith’s discussion of the diversity of types of dogs in Book I, Chapter 2 of the Wealth of Nations. The strength of the mastiff, the swiftness of the greyhound, the sagacity of the spaniel, or the docility of the shepherd dog are almost all the result of artificial crossbreeding and selection in successive generations, to make them suitable for guarding, hunting, petting or shepherding. According to Smith, in the case of the division of labour among men, the difference in the original...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.