Economic Analysis of International Law
Show Less

Economic Analysis of International Law

Edited by Eugene Kontorovich and Francesco Parisi

Through original and incisive contributions from leading scholars, this book applies economics and other rational choice methods to understanding public international law. The chapters cover a range of topics, from the sources of international law to means of enforcement. The application of economic analysis to public international law is still in its early stages, and Economic Analysis of International Law provides a useful overview, as well as setting directions for new research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: The emergence and evolution of customary international law

Francesco Parisi and Daniel Pi


The Statute of the International Court of Justice identifies three primary sources of public international law: (1) international conventions; (2) international custom; and (3) general principles of law. In this chapter, we discuss the emergence and evolution of the second source, customary law, from the perspective of law and economics. Let us begin by looking at what the term customary international law (CIL) means. The term ‘custom’ in a legal context describes normative practices that develop independently of the law in a decentralized manner, but which gradually take on an obligatory (legal) character. Customs become recognized as ‘customary law’ when they acquire binding force. In its most general form then, customary law is characterized by (a) decentralized formation, and (b) centralized enforcement. Customary law can be found both within domestic legal systems, where it is becoming increasingly rare, and in international law, where it plays a major role. The reasons why customary law should be especially important in an international context are complex and manifold, relating principally to the historical absence of a centralized law-making body and problems in effective adjudication and enforcement prior to the middle of the twentieth century. Without digressing too deeply into the philosophical and historical reasons why international law failed to develop centralized law-making mechanisms, it suffices to observe that the absence of ‘global legislation’ left a law-making vacuum in the international arena – a void which customary law filled.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.