International Handbook on the Economics of Mega Sporting Events
Show Less

International Handbook on the Economics of Mega Sporting Events

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Wolfgang Maennig and Andrew Zimbalist

From the Olympics to the World Cup, mega sporting events are a source of enjoyment for tens of thousands of people, but can also be a source of intense debate and controversy. This insightful Handbook addresses a number of central questions, including: How are host cities selected and under what economic conditions? How are these events organized, and how is local resistance overcome? Based on historical and empirical experience, what are the pitfalls for the organizers of these events? What are the potential economic benefits, including any international image effects? How can the costs be minimized and the benefits maximized for host cities and countries? How do these mega events impact the challenges of globalization and what is their environmental legacy?
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 15: Economic Impact of Sports Events

Philip K. Porter and Daniel M. Chin

Extract

15 Economic impact of sports events Philip K. Porter and Daniel M. Chin 1 INTRODUCTION In March 1997 sports economists Robert Baade, Philip Porter and Andrew Zimbalist offered testimony in the trial Poe v. Hillsborough County. At issue was the constitutionality of Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida and the Tampa Sports Authority using their taxing power and credit to build a stadium for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.1 Florida law forbids government using either its taxing power or credit in support of private individuals unless such a project serves a ‘paramount public purpose’.2 The trial set the stage for a decade of research by economists into the claims of teams and sporting event sponsors. The National Football League (NFL) in conjunction with Hillsborough County and Tampa City offered testimony from two individuals: one reporting the annual economic impact on the community generated by the presence of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the other reporting on research conducted by the Arizona Office of Tourism and the Super Bowl Host Committee about the impact of the 1996 Super Bowl in Phoenix. Tampa was being offered a Super Bowl if they built a new stadium for the team. Zimbalist’s testimony set the stage, describing the NFL, how it obtained monopoly power and could force communities under threat of departure to subsidize team stadium costs. Baade testified that ‘professional sports teams generally have no significant impact on a metropolitan economy’ and ‘sports investments appear to be an economically unsound use of a community’s scarce financial resources’...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.