Transnational Culture in the Internet Age
Show Less

Transnational Culture in the Internet Age

Edited by Sean A. Pager and Adam Candeub

The insightful contributions shed new light on insufficiently examined issues and highlight connections that cut across the many different domains in which such regulations operate. Building upon the framework presented by David Post – one of the first and most prominent scholars of cyber law and a contributor to this volume – the authors address the implications and economics of the Internet’s astronomical scale, jurisdiction and enforcement of the web as it relates to topics including libel tourism and threats to free speech, and the power of global communication to dissolve and recreate identities.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Timid Liberalism: A Critique of the Process-Oriented Norms for Internet Blocking

Milton Mueller


Milton Mueller* 6.1 INTRODUCTION The Internet made a major contribution to global society by disrupting the regulation of media content by nation-states. It took the libertarian principle of “absence of prior restraint” and globalized it: no one had to ask for permission, or be licensed, to make their ideas and publications globally accessible. Open access took states by surprise. The explosion of ideas, services and expression associated with the Internet’s growth in the 1990s happened because states weren’t prepared for it and because states weren’t in charge. Yet even if many of us accept the value of this regulatory breakdown, certain kinds of expression are still considered taboo, and public authorities want to censor them. The flat, global nature of Internet access, and the ease with which content can be created and posted in any jurisdiction, mean that effective prosecution and removal of illegal content can no longer be restricted to one territory.1 Thus, there is a growing trend for national governments to block access to websites.2 This chapter is intended to contribute to an argument against all blocking of Internet content. It focuses in particular on a new kind of rationale for internet blocking: what I call the “process-oriented approach.” This argument, which has been put forward most systematically by legal * This is an excerpt and adaptation of Chapter 9 in my new book Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance (MIT Press, 2010). 1 See Lili Levi and Kevin Saunders, Chapter 3 and 5 in this...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.