Culture and Economic Action
Show Less

Culture and Economic Action

Edited by Laura E. Grube and Virgil Henry Storr

This edited volume, a collection of both theoretical essays and empirical studies, presents an Austrian economics perspective on the role of culture in economic action. The authors illustrate that culture cannot be separated from economic action, but that it is in fact part of all decision-making.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: National cultures, economic action and the homogeneity problem: insights from the case of Romania

Paul Dragos Aligica and Aura Matei


The influential thesis that ‘culture matters’ is in many cases investigated using research designs predicated on the assumption of aggregated entities called ‘national cultures.’ The existence of a nationally identifiable and relatively homogeneous political, civic and economic culture is a basic building block of an important part of the literature studying how culture shapes and is shaped by economic activity. Examples abound, from comparative politics research originating in the well-known work of Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba (1963) and illustrated today by authors such as Ronald Inglehart (1990, 1997), to economics and management studies such as in Charles Hampden-Turner and Alfons Trompenaars’s book tellingly entitled The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands (1993). The underlying assumption of this approach (now associated with an entire family of research programs) is that, for descriptive and analytical reasons, one may use as units of observation and units of analysis a series of ‘social facts’ called ‘cultures’ sufficiently homogeneous at the national level to be described as cohesive aggregate-level variables. These phenomena or ‘social facts’ called ‘national cultures’ are shaping and are being shaped by other social, economic and institutional factors. Using the ‘homogeneity-central tendency’ perspective is both legitimate and fruitful in many cases. Relevant insights have been gained using the theoretical-methodological lenses provided that way. However, even without questioning the ontological and causal nature of ‘national cultures,’ one may easily think of an alternative approach.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.