Edited by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Chapter 10: What governmental insider trading teaches us about corporate insider trading
There has been much academic debate about whether corporate insider trading should be banned. As Stephen Bainbridge recounts in the Introduction to this volume, that debate was sparked by Henry Manne’s influential 1966 book, Insider Trading and the Stock Market. Manne contended that corporate insider trading should be deregulated because the benefits to both society and the firm whose stock was traded outweighed the costs. He provided two basic rationales. First, Manne argued that corporate insider trading has the effect of moving securities prices toward the level that they would have reached had the inside information been made public. This increase in price accuracy helps allocate capital to its most productive uses. Secondly, and more provocatively, Manne argued that corporate insider trading was “the most appropriate device for compensating entrepreneurs in large corporations.” Unlike ordinary managers whose service is easy to monitor and “can be purchased like any commodity in the marketplace,” it is difficult to ascertain the value of an entrepreneur’s services in the form of a predetermined salary. Instead, Manne argued, insider trading provides a means by which companies can compensate entrepreneurs for the value of their innovations.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.