Industrial Productivity in Europe
Show Less

Industrial Productivity in Europe

Growth and Crisis

Edited by Matilde Mas and Robert Stehrer

This book analyzes growth at the total economy and industry level from an international perspective, providing unique cross-country comparisons. The authors focus on the EU-25 countries but also include the US, Japan and Korea. The chapters explore growth patterns from a long-run perspective, although greater attention is paid to the period of expansion from 1995–2007 and the post 2008 period of crisis. Each contribution builds on a common methodology based on a detailed database providing a high degree of disaggregation with respect to the industries and factors accounting for growth. The role played by ICT is expertly emphasized, in particular the different paths followed in the US and the EU.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Skills and the Competitiveness of EU Manufacturing Industries

Michael Landesmann and Robert Stehrer


* Michael Landesmann and Robert Stehrer 12.1 INTRODUCTION The relationship between human capital and productivity growth (i.e., GDP per capita) has widely been discussed in the literature on (endogenous) growth at the macroeconomic level. Important contributions also providing overviews over the relevant topics in this respect are, for example, Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1995) and Aghion and Howitt (1998), and for more recent contributions see Helpman (2004) and European Commission (2006). The role of human capital was particularly emphasized in Mankiw et al. (1992) where human capital was introduced in the Solow model (Solow, 1956) as an ordinary factor of production alongside labour and capital. Empirical work along these lines produced somewhat mixed results where also the measurement of human capital was debated (see De la Fuente and Ciccone, 2003 and Sianesi and van Reenen, 2003 for recent overviews). From a theoretical viewpoint the Mankiw et al. (1992) approach may be questioned in that the treatment of human capital as a direct input is misleading as pointed out by Benhabib and Spiegel (1994). In the latter contribution – based on Nelson and Phelps (1966) – technical progress is a function of the stock of human capital and thus only has an indirect effect; this is in line with contributions from the endogenous growth literature (see e.g., Romer, 1990). Although there are a number of contributions at the total economy level the effect of human capital at the sectoral level is less developed. At the industry level there exists a large literature on the sectoral...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.