Edited by Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio
This chapter has a fairly specific agenda: it focuses on the relations between decentralization and poverty reduction. While the chapter does not avoid touching on broader decentralization–development linkages, the focus is on poverty. The chapter takes into account that decentralization may affect poverty directly and indirectly. Direct effects relate, for example, to regional and local targeting of financial transfers, while indirect effects may refer to the impact of decentralization on economic growth and on the effectiveness, coverage and efficiency of local public services for the poor (Sepulveda and Martinez-Vazquez, 2011). Decentralization is not a goal in itself. It is an instrument for efficient and participatory governance. It has emerged as one of the most important governance reforms in recent history: approximately 80 percent of all developing and transition countries have implemented this reform in the past three decades (Crawford and Hartmann, 2008; Work, 2002). A common argument in favor of decentralization is that it will contribute to poverty reduction ‘by bringing government closer to the people’ (Smith, 1996).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.