Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography
Show Less

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Martin Andersson and Therese Norman

The main purpose of this Handbook is to provide overviews and assessments of the state-of-the-art regarding research methods, approaches and applications central to economic geography. The chapters are written by distinguished researchers from a variety of scholarly traditions and with a background in different academic disciplines including economics, economic, human and cultural geography, and economic history. The resulting handbook covers a broad spectrum of methodologies and approaches applicable in analyses pertaining to the geography of economic activities and economic outcomes.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Social accounting analysis

Demetrios Psaltopoulos and Dimitris Skuras


Various quantitative methods and approaches have been applied to the analysis of the spatial distribution of economic activity and the underlying forces that drive this distribution. Regional science has been largely credited with the development of such analytical techniques, which include location analysis, urban complex analysis, as well as general equilibrium tools such as spatial econometric, gravity, input–output and social accounting analysis. More than frequently, these modeling tools concentrated on practical applications in regional planning, economic development and so on (Isard et al., 1998) and rather ‘sacrificed’ mainstream economic theory (at least in the opinion of economic purists) in favor of practical analysis. Indicatively, constant returns and linear production and consumption functions are popular assumptions for those criticizing the analytical rigor of these approaches, which have nevertheless contributed to the understanding of the geography of economic behavior (Cole Tanner, 2005). Subsequent theoretical advances by the new economic geography literature (e.g. Fujita et al., 1999; Puga, 1999) focused on external and internal increasing returns and transport costs and led to the development of canonical models (Baldwin et al., 2003). However, despite satisfying the rigorous tenets of mainstream economics, these ‘theoretically sound’ models have been criticized for being either too abstract or/and rather unsuitable for sound empirical analysis (Boddy, 1999).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.