Poor Leadership and Bad Governance
Show Less

Poor Leadership and Bad Governance

Reassessing Presidents and Prime Ministers in North America, Europe and Japan

Edited by Ludger Helms

Focusing on the presidents and prime ministers of the G8 – the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Russia and Japan – it explores the complex relationship between weak and ineffective leadership, undemocratic leadership techniques, and bad policies from a broad comparative perspective. What makes leaders weak or bad in different contexts? What are the consequences of their actions and behaviour? And has there been any learning from negative experience? These questions are at the centre of this fascinating joint inquiry that involves a team of truly distinguished leadership scholars.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Presidents Behaving Badly: Poor Leadership and Bad Governance in France

John Gaffney


John Gaffney When studying leadership and governance in France, particularly within a comparative framework as is implied by a book of this kind, one has to address an issue which has come to haunt French studies, a phenomenon that has pushed analysis of France away from the enormous value of the comparative, namely, the question of the ‘French exception’ (Chafer and Godin 2010). Leadership and governance, both good and bad, are universal political and social institutions. Is France truly an exception in such company, and does this – and if so, how – inform our study of the French variety? Almond and Verba’s (1963) comparative study of political cultures deliberately missed France out of its study, because it did not ‘fit’ properly. It was emerging from the Algerian crisis and the creation of de Gaulle’s new regime in 1958 (Andrews 1982; Nick 1998; Rémond 1983; Sirius 1958; Terrenoire 1964). But the exclusions have been rife ever since. For Almond and Verba, it was the political flux and instability France was in that made them feel it was inappropriate to include it. We could say, however, that, although the regime is over 50 years old, having enjoyed real stability, especially by French standards, it remains the case that the discourse of drama and crisis, and the perceived role of the ‘providential man’, acting decisively to avert disaster and restore the state’s integrity, flooded into the early Fifth Republic, and have gone on informing, even driving, leadership and governance ever since. As regards...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.