Deficits, Debt, and Democracy
Show Less

Deficits, Debt, and Democracy

Wrestling with Tragedy on the Fiscal Commons

Richard E. Wagner

This timely book reveals that the budget deficits and accumulating debts that plague modern democracies reflect a clash between two rationalities of governance: one of private property and one of common property. The clashing of these rationalities at various places in society creates forms of societal tectonics that play out through budgeting. The book demonstrates that while this clash is an inherent feature of democratic political economy, it can nonetheless be limited through embracing once again a constitution of liberty.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 2: Budgeting and Political Economy: A Theoretical Framework

Richard E. Wagner

Extract

2 Budgeting and political economy: a theoretical framework When budgeting is treated as a matter of arithmetic, restoration of sound finance seems easy to achieve. A $1 trillion deficit could be eliminated over ten years simply by reducing expenditures by $100 billion per year. This annual reduction is little more than a rounding error in the fiscal accounts, as it amounts to less than 1 percent of GDP. To think of budgeting in this way is to think of it the way an individual might think about paring down some accumulated debt. This way of thinking is illustrated well by the widely used practice of reducing a national economy to a representative individual and reasoning in terms of that hypothetical individual. It is also illustrated by the practice of thinking and reasoning in terms of average magnitudes regarding variables of interest. All analytical efforts that proceed in this fashion treat a collection of individuals, no matter how large that collection might be, as equivalent to a single individual. Reducing budgeting by a collective body to budgeting by an individual has simplicity on its side. In dealing with complex situations, some efforts to achieve simplification will always be necessary to move the analytical effort forward. But there are different ways of achieving that simplification, some of which will distort unduly the nature of the situation that has generated the observations that require correction. This kind of distortion arises in collective budgeting when the setting is reduced to one of individual choice,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.