Handbook of the Politics of the Arctic
Show Less

Handbook of the Politics of the Arctic

Edited by Leif Christian Jensen and Geir Hønneland

The Arctic has again become one of the leading issues on the international foreign policy agenda, in a manner unseen since the Cold War. Drawing on the perspectives of geo-politics and international law, this Handbook offers fresh insights and perspectives on the most pressing issues, grouped under the headings of political ascendancy, climate and environmental issues, resources and energy, and the response and policies of affected countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 12: Arctic sovereignty and its legal significance for Canada

Donald R. Rothwell

Extract

Polar sovereignty was a relatively dormant issue in the second half of the twentieth century. In the Arctic, most territorial claims had been settled by World War II, and while the Cold War introduced military and security tensions into the Arctic, none of these directly related to contested territorial sovereignty (Grant 2010). Territorial sovereignty has been less contentious in the Arctic than in Antarctica, superficially because there has been less disputed territory. Following the period of intense discovery of Arctic lands in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which included the ‘race for the Pole’, Arctic territorial disputes were settled in a relatively orderly fashion, including by reference to the Permanent Court of International Justice. At present, the only territorial dispute is that between Canada and Denmark over Hans Island, a very small island that straddles Nares Strait between Greenland and Ellesmere Island (Stevenson 2007). More recently, however, Arctic outer continental shelf claims have become a source of tension, placing the spotlight on the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) as it reviews continental shelf claims from Arctic states. The status of certain Arctic waters also remains in dispute – including the Northwest Passage, where the United States questions Canadian sovereignty over those waters. Yet the dawn of the twenty-first century has seen a significant shift in the debate over Arctic sovereignty, due to several factors.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.