Edited by Leif Christian Jensen and Geir Hønneland
Chapter 16: Institutional complexity in Arctic governance: curse or blessing?
A whole suite of institutions at province, national and international levels may influence developments in the Arctic, and efforts to use them for such purposes have multiplied in recent years. Sub-national governments cooperate through several circumpolar or narrower bodies, including the Northern Forum and the Barents Regional Council. National Arctic policy documents are routinely developed and refined not only by regional states but also by non-Arctic players like the UK, Germany and the EU. One EU body, the European Commission, is even a founding member of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region; another, the European Parliament, has controversially called for a comprehensive international environmental treaty applicable to the Arctic Ocean. The USA’s initiative for creating a regional high-seas fisheries management organization for the Arctic Ocean obtained some success with the 2014 agreement among the Arctic coastal states on ‘the need for interim precautionary measures to prevent any future commercial fisheries without the prior establishment of appropriate regulatory mechanisms’.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.